<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pudge For Kyle &#8211; Initial Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tigerblog.net/pudge-for-kyle-initial-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tigerblog.net/pudge-for-kyle-initial-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:29:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CP</title>
		<link>http://www.tigerblog.net/pudge-for-kyle-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-43438</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tigerblog.net/pudge-for-kyle-initial-thoughts/#comment-43438</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but isn&#039;t there a maximum 20% pay cut allowed in arbitration? That would mean over $10M. Would the Tigers have offered that? It could be interpreted as insulting to issue the max pay cut? An arbiter might rule in Pudge&#039;s favor anyway since he is an above average hitting catcher and that seems to be what the market is paying. Would Pudge have accepted it? Or would he be interested in a longer term, but more lucrative deal elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but isn&#8217;t there a maximum 20% pay cut allowed in arbitration? That would mean over $10M. Would the Tigers have offered that? It could be interpreted as insulting to issue the max pay cut? An arbiter might rule in Pudge&#8217;s favor anyway since he is an above average hitting catcher and that seems to be what the market is paying. Would Pudge have accepted it? Or would he be interested in a longer term, but more lucrative deal elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juskimo</title>
		<link>http://www.tigerblog.net/pudge-for-kyle-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-43299</link>
		<dc:creator>Juskimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tigerblog.net/pudge-for-kyle-initial-thoughts/#comment-43299</guid>
		<description>Great point about arbitration.  My first thought when the trade scenarios started getting discussed was &quot;why would Pudge turn down arbitration?&quot;  I don&#039;t purport to know the situation with the other teams, but I can&#039;t imagine that there are two many teams willing to give him two years and $10-12 million.  If Pudge goes to arbitration, I can see him asking for, and getting $7 million, especially considering that Posada just signed for $13 mill a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point about arbitration.  My first thought when the trade scenarios started getting discussed was &#8220;why would Pudge turn down arbitration?&#8221;  I don&#8217;t purport to know the situation with the other teams, but I can&#8217;t imagine that there are two many teams willing to give him two years and $10-12 million.  If Pudge goes to arbitration, I can see him asking for, and getting $7 million, especially considering that Posada just signed for $13 mill a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
